CircleCI vs GitHub Actions: CI CD platform comparison

gitlab ci cd vs github actions

On the other hand, GitLab CI/CD, as part of the GitLab platform, provides a unified experience, making it an attractive option for teams already using GitLab for version control. A team that opts for the paid tier of CircleCI will benefit from larger compute instance sizes and more credits per month. These functionalities allow programmers to run more builds with extra credits and run builds quicker with more compute power. The paid tiers in CircleCI also allow more users, which applies to private repositories. On GitHub Actions, the paid tiers unlock more minutes of build time. The vendor breaks down the features available in the Free, Team and Enterprise versions here.

  1. It enables users to build, test, and deploy their code directly from GitHub.
  2. GitHub Actions is a CI/CD tool that allows developers to automate their software development workflows.
  3. You can configure a job’s dependencies with other jobs; by default, jobs have no dependencies and run in parallel with each other.
  4. If you value community-driven resources and tight integration with GitHub, GitHub Actions could be the right choice for you.

Productivity and patience: How GitHub Copilot is expanding development horizons

gitlab ci cd vs github actions

ZDNET’s recommendations are based on many hours of testing, research, and comparison shopping. We gather data from the best available sources, including vendor and retailer listings as well as other relevant and independent reviews sites. And we pore over customer reviews to find out what matters to real people who already own and use the products and services we’re assessing.

problems stacked diffs address

gitlab ci cd vs github actions

Both GitLab CI/CD and GitHub Actions offer managed and self-hosted variants of runners. In GitLab CI/CD, tags are used to run jobs on different platforms, while in GitHub Actions it is done with the runs-on key. Privileged information, often referred to as “secrets”, is sensitive informationor credentials you need in your CI/CD workflow. You might use secrets to unlock protected resourcesor sensitive information in tools, applications, containers, and cloud-native environments.

GitHub Actions syntax for databases and service containers

When it comes to deployment strategies, GitLab CI/CD shines with its support for a variety of strategies, including canary, incremental rollouts, and blue/green deployments. While GitHub Actions is highly flexible and customizable, it doesn’t provide built-in support for these strategies, making GitLab CI/CD a more feature-rich choice for complex deployments. Moreover, container software like Docker has also been extensively used as a solution for dependency hell. If a machine needs to be running many services with conflicting dependencies they can be isolated using containers. I am currently evaluating different CI/CD tools for my project and trying to understand the unique advantages of each. I’ve come across Drone CI/CD, which is known for its lightweight design, easy setup, and extensibility through plugins.

CircleCI vs. GitHub Actions: CI/CD platform comparison

This repository of reusable components can significantly reduce the time spent on writing boilerplate code, allowing developers to focus on the unique aspects of their projects. While GitLab CI/CD also supports custom scripts, it currently lacks a similar marketplace, making GitHub Actions a more appealing choice for developers who value community-driven resources. Instead of relying on ANU’s machine as an instance for running stages, we can use self-hosted runners on gitlab from providers such as AWS (via EC2), Azure (via it’s VM service), etc. In this case, we assume that the host is the same as your local machine, and you needs to configure it to run the pipelines. Usually, you write a file that defines how to construct your container.

gitlab ci cd vs github actions

I suggest starting with their free plans to get an idea of how your workflow operates on each platform and then look into subscribing to the one that works best for you. Of course, you can make either one work the way you want, but there’s a clear difference between the https://traderoom.info/ two systems’ advocated approaches. When you click through from our site to a retailer and buy a product or service, we may earn affiliate commissions. This helps support our work, but does not affect what we cover or how, and it does not affect the price you pay.

So, if all you want is basic Git functionality but with someone else to worry over keeping Git up and running, either service will do well for you. GitHub provides Linux, Windows, and macOS virtual machines to run your workflows, or you can host your own self-hosted runners in your own data center or cloud infrastructure. One approach to centralizing the CI/CD configuration is to use GitHub Actions with GitLab CI YAML files.

Both GitLab CI/CD and GitHub Actions utilize YAML for configuration, providing a straightforward, human-readable format. However, GitLab CI/CD takes a step further with its CI Lint tool, which validates your .gitlab-ci.yml file before committing. This preemptive check can save developers from potential headaches caused by incorrect configurations, making the setup process smoother and more efficient. Alternatively, you can also use the gradle https://traderoom.info/gitlab-ci-vs-github-actions/ wrapper ./gradelw at the root of the project, which will automatically install the dependencies for you. If gradle is selected, before running the build and test stages, you also have to pull the respective docker image (of gradle/java) in the corresponding runner. Continuous integration, or CI, is an umbrella termfor “event-triggered actions that run whenever aparticular event happens (usually on the the serverwhere the code is stored)”.

Both run on Linux servers, come with issue trackers and offer a wide range of third-party integrations and import tools. If you do need the bells and whistles of a hosted Git service, however, then let me break it down — from the differences in software services to similarities in interfaces and core values. Our goal is to deliver the most accurate information and the most knowledgeable advice possible in order to help you make smarter buying decisions on tech gear and a wide array of products and services. Our editors thoroughly review and fact-check every article to ensure that our content meets the highest standards. If we have made an error or published misleading information, we will correct or clarify the article.

GitHub Actions charges based on the number of minutes used, while GitLab provides a certain number of CI/CD minutes per month based on your GitLab plan. This difference in pricing models could make one tool more cost-effective than the other, depending on your usage patterns. Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search.